- Phone & Tablets
- Compare
- Nokia 3.2 vs Samsung Galaxy S10e
Nokia 3.2 vs Samsung Galaxy S10e - compare details and specifications

Do you wish to compare Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e? Here you will find a very good comparison of the specs for the Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e. Do you wish to know if Nokia 3.2 has a better camera that Samsung Galaxy S10e? Do you wish to know if the CPU of Samsung Galaxy S10e is better that Nokia 3.2? Just check all of the specs.. and you will find the answer.
P.S: for now this feature is in beta. We are working on giving you more better results!
Compare Platform for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
ChipsetQualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429 (12 nm) Exynos 9820 (8 nm) - EMEA/LATAM
Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) - USA/China -
CPUQuad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Mongoose M4 & 2x2.31 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - EMEA/LATAM
Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) - USA/China -
GPUAdreno 504 Mali-G76 MP12 - EMEA/LATAM
Adreno 640 - USA/China -
OSAndroid 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, Android One Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, One UI 2
Compare System on Chip (SoC) for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
Compare Display for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
Size6.26 inches, 97.8 cm2 (~80.5% screen-to-body ratio) 5.8 inches, 82.8 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio)
-
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5
-
Resolution720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~438 ppi density)
-
TypeIPS LCD Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+
-
Always-on display
Compare Body for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
Dimensions159.4 x 76.2 x 8.6 mm (6.28 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) 142.2 x 69.9 x 7.9 mm (5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 in)
-
Weight181 g (6.38 oz) 150 g (5.29 oz)
-
SIMDual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
-
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame
-
Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified)
IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified)
IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins)
Compare Memory for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot) microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual SIM model only
-
Internal16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
-
eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.1
Compare Camera for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
Compare Main Camera for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
Single13 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, AF
-
Dual12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS
16 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm, Super Steady video -
Video1080p@30fps 4K@60fps (no EIS), 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS & OIS
-
FeaturesLED flash LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama
Compare Selfie camera for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
FeaturesDual video call, Auto-HDR
-
Single5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5", 1.12µm 10 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm, Dual Pixel PDAF
-
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps
Compare Battery for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
TypeLi-Ion 4000 mAh, non-removable Li-Ion 3100 mAh, non-removable
-
ChargingCharging 10W Fast charging 15W
Compare Features for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
SensorsFingerprint (rear-mounted, 32/3GB only), accelerometer, proximity Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
-
ANT+
Bixby natural language commands and dictation
Compare Misc for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
ColorsBlack, Steel Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Green, Prism Blue, Canary Yellow, Flamingo Pink
-
SAR EU0.24 W/kg (head) 1.63 W/kg (body) 0.58 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body)
-
SAR0.56 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body)
-
ModelsTA-1156, TA-1159, TA-1164 SM-G970F, SM-G970U, SM-G970W, SM-G9700, SM-G970U1
Compare Network for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
-
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global, USA
-
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 - EMEA, APAC, MENA 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global
-
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (7CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps
-
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE
-
1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India CDMA 800 / 1900 - USA
CDMA2000 1xEV-DO - USA
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - USA
Compare Sound for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
32-bit/384kHz audio
Tuned by AKG 32-bit/384kHz audio
Tuned by AKG -
3.5mm jackYes Yes
-
LoudspeakerYes Yes, with stereo speakers
Compare Launch for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
Announced2019, February 24 2019, February 20
-
StatusAvailable. Released 2019, May 22 Available. Released 2019, March 08
Compare Comms for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
-
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP, LE, aptX 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX
-
GPSYes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
-
NFCNo Yes
-
RadioFM radio FM radio (USA & Canada only)
-
USBmicroUSB 2.0, USB On-The-Go USB Type-C 3.1
-
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot
Compare Tracking/Positioning for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
Compare Storage for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
Compare SIM card for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
Compare USB for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
Compare Bluetooth for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
Compare Memory cards for Nokia 3.2 and Samsung Galaxy S10e
Other compare lists
-
Energizer Energy E12 vs Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 View Comparison →
-
Coolpad Cool 5 vs Google Pixel 2 XL View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Tab A 8.0 2018 LTE View Comparison →
-
BLU C5 2019 vs Honor Magic 2 View Comparison →
-
Realme 3 vs Samsung Galaxy J6+ View Comparison →
-
Xiaomi Mi CC9 Pro vs LG G7 Fit View Comparison →
-
Huawei nova 5 vs Huawei Y6 Pro (2019) View Comparison →
-
BLU G6 vs Samsung Galaxy M10 View Comparison →
-
Coolpad Cool 5 vs LG Q8 View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy A51 vs Huawei nova 3 View Comparison →
-
TECNO Spark Power 2 vs Nokia 5310 (2020) View Comparison →
-
Nokia 7.2 vs Samsung Galaxy Note10 View Comparison →
-
Oppo Reno3 vs Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) View Comparison →
-
Huawei nova 5 vs Xiaomi Redmi Go View Comparison →
-
Oppo A92 vs Honor Play 9A View Comparison →
-
Infinix S5 vs Samsung Galaxy Note8 View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy A10s vs Samsung Galaxy A90 5G View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro vs BLU Vivo X5 View Comparison →
-
Honor Play 3 vs Google Pixel 3 XL View Comparison →
-
ZTE Axon 10 Pro 5G vs LG Q60 View Comparison →
-
Motorola Moto G8 Play vs Nokia 8.1 (Nokia X7) View Comparison →
-
ZTE Axon 10s Pro 5G vs Apple iPhone XS View Comparison →
-
Honor 30 Youth vs Samsung Galaxy A51 5G View Comparison →
-
Huawei Enjoy 10s vs ZTE Blade A7 View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy A80 vs Apple iPhone XR View Comparison →
-
Honor Play vs Nokia 9 PureView View Comparison →
-
ZTE nubia Z20 vs OnePlus 6T View Comparison →
-
Lava Z71 vs Honor 8X View Comparison →
-
BLU View 1 vs Samsung Galaxy M10 View Comparison →
-
Huawei Mate 30 5G vs Huawei Mate 10 Pro View Comparison →